<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Revenue Officer&#039;s Exam Insufficient for Determining Tobacco Content in Product; No Duty Without Concrete Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41146</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal - Product contains tobacco or not - The physical examination by the Revenue officer is not acceptable who is not a chemical examiner - The duty liability cannot be fastened on the appellant on mere assumptions and presumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:12:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:12:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Revenue Officer&#039;s Exam Insufficient for Determining Tobacco Content in Product; No Duty Without Concrete Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41146</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal - Product contains tobacco or not - The physical examination by the Revenue officer is not acceptable who is not a chemical examiner - The duty liability cannot be fastened on the appellant on mere assumptions and presumptions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:12:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>