<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 6 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 40,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000, finding it to be in the interest of justice due to the circumstances surrounding the case, including the time elapsed since the offense and the evolving legal landscape. The appellant&#039;s plea for quashing the penalty was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:06:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 6 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs. 40,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000, finding it to be in the interest of justice due to the circumstances surrounding the case, including the time elapsed since the offense and the evolving legal landscape. The appellant&#039;s plea for quashing the penalty was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>