<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1388 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the confirmation of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the penalty imposition was not justified as the show cause notice did not clearly specify the charge, following precedents from Karnataka and Bombay High Courts. Consequently, the penalties were canceled, and all of the Assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 05:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1388 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the confirmation of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the penalty imposition was not justified as the show cause notice did not clearly specify the charge, following precedents from Karnataka and Bombay High Courts. Consequently, the penalties were canceled, and all of the Assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>