<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1389 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274759</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ appeal, revision petition, and writ petition, finding the assessments completed by the authorities within permissible time limits. The reliance on provisions of the KGST Act for CST assessments was upheld, along with the invalidation of &#039;F&#039; Forms and application of the principle of &quot;actus curiae neminem gravabit.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 05:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1389 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274759</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ appeal, revision petition, and writ petition, finding the assessments completed by the authorities within permissible time limits. The reliance on provisions of the KGST Act for CST assessments was upheld, along with the invalidation of &#039;F&#039; Forms and application of the principle of &quot;actus curiae neminem gravabit.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>