https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274760 The High Court found that the petitioner, a real estate developer, did not challenge the notices for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act within the prescribed time limit. The Court directed the petitioner to file objections within two weeks and respondent No.2 to decide on them within six weeks. The Court emphasized the need to raise objections and provide detailed replies to address jurisdictional issues effectively. The writ petition was disposed of with the clarification that further remedies could be sought if grievances persisted after the authority's decision. en-us Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 05:55:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274760 The High Court found that the petitioner, a real estate developer, did not challenge the notices for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act within the prescribed time limit. The Court directed the petitioner to file objections within two weeks and respondent No.2 to decide on them within six weeks. The Court emphasized the need to raise objections and provide detailed replies to address jurisdictional issues effectively. The writ petition was disposed of with the clarification that further remedies could be sought if grievances persisted after the authority's decision. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274760