https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274765 Article 226 writ jurisdiction will not be used to supervise or stall duly authorised departmental proceedings under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 where the survey at the assessee's premises was authorised by the competent authority. Mere allegations against officials, without a clear evidentiary foundation, were insufficient to justify quashing the proceedings or directing an investigation into the handling of the assessee's complaint or the department's internal functioning. Allegations relating to customs officials were also held irrelevant to interference with the VAT proceedings. The departmental action was therefore allowed to continue in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 05:55:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274765 Article 226 writ jurisdiction will not be used to supervise or stall duly authorised departmental proceedings under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 where the survey at the assessee's premises was authorised by the competent authority. Mere allegations against officials, without a clear evidentiary foundation, were insufficient to justify quashing the proceedings or directing an investigation into the handling of the assessee's complaint or the department's internal functioning. Allegations relating to customs officials were also held irrelevant to interference with the VAT proceedings. The departmental action was therefore allowed to continue in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274765