<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1360 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, determining that the Assessing Officer had failed to adequately verify or inquire into seized material indicating accommodation entries. Consequently, the reassessment order was annulled, with directions for the AO to scrutinize the seized material and confront the assessee as necessary. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 05:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1360 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, determining that the Assessing Officer had failed to adequately verify or inquire into seized material indicating accommodation entries. Consequently, the reassessment order was annulled, with directions for the AO to scrutinize the seized material and confront the assessee as necessary. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>