<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1595 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274768</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, upholding the categorization of rental income as &#039;business income&#039; for the appellant. The court emphasized the finality of the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision for the assessment year 2008-09, which the Revenue had accepted without appeal. Consequently, the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 05:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1595 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274768</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, upholding the categorization of rental income as &#039;business income&#039; for the appellant. The court emphasized the finality of the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision for the assessment year 2008-09, which the Revenue had accepted without appeal. Consequently, the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>