https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274769 The court ruled that independent quasi-judicial bodies cannot be compelled to condone delays universally, emphasizing that discretion must be exercised based on individual case circumstances. It clarified that while the Circular aimed to allow flexibility in condoning delays, it should not mandate blanket condonation. The court required the State to submit an affidavit detailing Circular implementation and Devasthan land status. The case was adjourned, and prior interim orders were adjusted accordingly. en-us Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 05:55:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274769 The court ruled that independent quasi-judicial bodies cannot be compelled to condone delays universally, emphasizing that discretion must be exercised based on individual case circumstances. It clarified that while the Circular aimed to allow flexibility in condoning delays, it should not mandate blanket condonation. The court required the State to submit an affidavit detailing Circular implementation and Devasthan land status. The case was adjourned, and prior interim orders were adjusted accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274769