<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1736 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366264</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to follow the Grievance Redressal Mechanism established by a circular to address their transitional credit issue, emphasizing timely submission for resolution through designated channels. The judgment did not express any view on the merits, providing specific directions for the petitioner to engage with the Nodal Officer within a specified timeline, ultimately disposing of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:07:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1736 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366264</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to follow the Grievance Redressal Mechanism established by a circular to address their transitional credit issue, emphasizing timely submission for resolution through designated channels. The judgment did not express any view on the merits, providing specific directions for the petitioner to engage with the Nodal Officer within a specified timeline, ultimately disposing of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>