<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1732 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366260</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition solely on the ground of low tax effect. The order does not address the merits of the income tax dispute and records disposal of pending applications accordingly. The operative effect is that the challenge was not entertained further because the tax effect threshold was insufficient to warrant consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1732 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366260</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition solely on the ground of low tax effect. The order does not address the merits of the income tax dispute and records disposal of pending applications accordingly. The operative effect is that the challenge was not entertained further because the tax effect threshold was insufficient to warrant consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>