<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1727 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366255</link>
    <description>The High Court approved modified terms of reference for special audit for assessment years 2008-2009 to 2013-2014 under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court directed that interim orders staying special audit and assessment proceedings for specific years would continue until the audit for the immediate preceding year is completed to streamline the process and prevent disputes. Parties could engage with the assessing officer and special auditor based on earlier audit or assessment orders. The court emphasized the importance of avoiding simultaneous audits for all years to prevent complications and manpower issues. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and pending advance pricing agreement proceedings were unaffected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 06:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1727 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366255</link>
      <description>The High Court approved modified terms of reference for special audit for assessment years 2008-2009 to 2013-2014 under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court directed that interim orders staying special audit and assessment proceedings for specific years would continue until the audit for the immediate preceding year is completed to streamline the process and prevent disputes. Parties could engage with the assessing officer and special auditor based on earlier audit or assessment orders. The court emphasized the importance of avoiding simultaneous audits for all years to prevent complications and manpower issues. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and pending advance pricing agreement proceedings were unaffected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>