<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1719 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and the incorrect application of section 154 by the Assessing Officer. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurate computation and interpretation of tax provisions in resolving disputes over rebate claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1719 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issue and the incorrect application of section 154 by the Assessing Officer. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurate computation and interpretation of tax provisions in resolving disputes over rebate claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>