<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366241</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to treat expenses on &quot;Project Eagle&quot; as revenue, aligning with the project&#039;s objective to enhance company performance in India. The Tribunal rectified an omission in its order, allowing the assessee&#039;s application and affirming the expenses as revenue in nature, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366241</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to treat expenses on &quot;Project Eagle&quot; as revenue, aligning with the project&#039;s objective to enhance company performance in India. The Tribunal rectified an omission in its order, allowing the assessee&#039;s application and affirming the expenses as revenue in nature, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>