<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1698 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of a revenue deposit, ruling that unjust enrichment did not apply. The appellant demonstrated the amount as recoverable from the revenue department in their balance sheet, justifying the refund claim. The Tribunal directed the assessing authority to refund the amount within 30 days with interest as per the Rules, citing various judgments on unjust enrichment in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:11:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1698 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund of a revenue deposit, ruling that unjust enrichment did not apply. The appellant demonstrated the amount as recoverable from the revenue department in their balance sheet, justifying the refund claim. The Tribunal directed the assessing authority to refund the amount within 30 days with interest as per the Rules, citing various judgments on unjust enrichment in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>