https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366222 The appellate authority set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The revocation of the warehousing license was deemed beyond the adjudicating authority's power. The destruction of goods due to non-compliance with FSSAI norms led to the remission of duty under section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's lack of intent to violate the Foreign Trade Policy was acknowledged, resulting in the nullification of duty liability and penalties. The order was overturned, relieving the appellant of duty and penalties due to the destruction of goods and absence of evidence of policy violations. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366222 The appellate authority set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The revocation of the warehousing license was deemed beyond the adjudicating authority's power. The destruction of goods due to non-compliance with FSSAI norms led to the remission of duty under section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's lack of intent to violate the Foreign Trade Policy was acknowledged, resulting in the nullification of duty liability and penalties. The order was overturned, relieving the appellant of duty and penalties due to the destruction of goods and absence of evidence of policy violations. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366222