<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1691 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366219</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, holding that the appellants were entitled to claim Cenvat Credit for the service tax paid on MPLS services provided by BIL. The court found errors in the Tribunal and Commissioner&#039;s questioning of service nature and credit eligibility. The invocation of the extended limitation period was deemed unjustified. The court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Tribunal and Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1691 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366219</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, holding that the appellants were entitled to claim Cenvat Credit for the service tax paid on MPLS services provided by BIL. The court found errors in the Tribunal and Commissioner&#039;s questioning of service nature and credit eligibility. The invocation of the extended limitation period was deemed unjustified. The court ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Tribunal and Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>