https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366215 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were liable to pay Service Tax only for the normal period after 20.04.2005. The extended period for demand of Service Tax was not invoked as the appellants' actions did not amount to willful suppression or intent to evade payment of duty. The Tribunal accepted the appellants' bona fide belief as a valid defense against the demand of Service Tax for the specified period. en-us Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:37:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366215 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were liable to pay Service Tax only for the normal period after 20.04.2005. The extended period for demand of Service Tax was not invoked as the appellants' actions did not amount to willful suppression or intent to evade payment of duty. The Tribunal accepted the appellants' bona fide belief as a valid defense against the demand of Service Tax for the specified period. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366215