<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1680 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for verification of the reversal of Cenvat credit in the ST-3 returns before potentially granting the refund, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and principles of natural justice. The decision highlighted the importance of preventing double benefit and emphasized the necessity of verification for fairness in the refund process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1680 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for verification of the reversal of Cenvat credit in the ST-3 returns before potentially granting the refund, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and principles of natural justice. The decision highlighted the importance of preventing double benefit and emphasized the necessity of verification for fairness in the refund process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>