<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1675 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366203</link>
    <description>Thirteen appeals were remanded for de novo consideration, challenging the denial of CENVAT credit on courier services and rent for job workers&#039; premises. The Tribunal found the remand unjustified, allowing the appeals and granting CENVAT credit for courier services and rent. The Commissioner(Appeals) was deemed to lack the power to remand in this scenario, and the decisions on credit were in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1675 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366203</link>
      <description>Thirteen appeals were remanded for de novo consideration, challenging the denial of CENVAT credit on courier services and rent for job workers&#039; premises. The Tribunal found the remand unjustified, allowing the appeals and granting CENVAT credit for courier services and rent. The Commissioner(Appeals) was deemed to lack the power to remand in this scenario, and the decisions on credit were in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>