<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1673 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366201</link>
    <description>Denial of relied upon documents necessary for defence vitiates fair adjudication because the assessee cannot effectively meet the allegations without access to the material used by the department. The procedural lapse justified setting aside the impugned orders and remand to the Original Authority for de novo consideration. The merits of the demand were not finally decided at this stage, and fresh adjudication was directed after observance of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:24:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1673 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366201</link>
      <description>Denial of relied upon documents necessary for defence vitiates fair adjudication because the assessee cannot effectively meet the allegations without access to the material used by the department. The procedural lapse justified setting aside the impugned orders and remand to the Original Authority for de novo consideration. The merits of the demand were not finally decided at this stage, and fresh adjudication was directed after observance of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>