<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366198</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal modified the remand order to ascertain the duty liability discharge on &#039;chloroquine phosphate&#039;, determine its value for liability under rule 57AD, and compute the resulting duty liability. The decision emphasized the importance of correctly determining the duty liability and differentiating between exempted and dutiable goods for CENVAT credit purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366198</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal modified the remand order to ascertain the duty liability discharge on &#039;chloroquine phosphate&#039;, determine its value for liability under rule 57AD, and compute the resulting duty liability. The decision emphasized the importance of correctly determining the duty liability and differentiating between exempted and dutiable goods for CENVAT credit purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>