https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366195 The Tribunal set aside the appropriation of rebate against dues arising from a previous order, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that the appropriation made during the pendency of the appeal and stay petition was not sustainable, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents. The Tribunal concluded that since the appeal in favor of the appellant had been allowed, the appropriation was invalid. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles governing recovery proceedings during the appeal process. en-us Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366195 The Tribunal set aside the appropriation of rebate against dues arising from a previous order, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal held that the appropriation made during the pendency of the appeal and stay petition was not sustainable, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents. The Tribunal concluded that since the appeal in favor of the appellant had been allowed, the appropriation was invalid. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal principles governing recovery proceedings during the appeal process. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366195