https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366193 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the discrepancy in stock quantities was due to an accounting error, not intentional evasion of duty. The tribunal determined that there was no suppression of facts and that the show cause notice issued was time-barred. As a result, the demand, interest, and penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366193 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the discrepancy in stock quantities was due to an accounting error, not intentional evasion of duty. The tribunal determined that there was no suppression of facts and that the show cause notice issued was time-barred. As a result, the demand, interest, and penalties imposed were set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366193