https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366192 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellants. The demand for inclusion of handling charges in the assessable value was rejected due to a fundamental difference between the allegation in the show cause notice and the actual nature of the charges. Additionally, the argument of limitation was considered, with the Tribunal finding no suppression of facts based on the appellant's accounts. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if applicable. en-us Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:15:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366192 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellants. The demand for inclusion of handling charges in the assessable value was rejected due to a fundamental difference between the allegation in the show cause notice and the actual nature of the charges. Additionally, the argument of limitation was considered, with the Tribunal finding no suppression of facts based on the appellant's accounts. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if applicable. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366192