<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1659 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the original authority to determine the correct interest amount payable by the appellant, finding that the interest liability calculation was in dispute despite the correct duty liability and refund calculation. The appellant&#039;s argument that the interest amount was erroneous was supported by detailed submissions and computations not considered by the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:12:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1659 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the original authority to determine the correct interest amount payable by the appellant, finding that the interest liability calculation was in dispute despite the correct duty liability and refund calculation. The appellant&#039;s argument that the interest amount was erroneous was supported by detailed submissions and computations not considered by the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>