<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1654 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366182</link>
    <description>Government litigation policy limiting Revenue appeals to matters above the enhanced monetary threshold was applied to pending cases as well, so the Tribunal declined to entertain the Revenue appeal where the amount involved was below Rs. 10,00,000 and dismissed it without examining the merits. The Tribunal relied on the Board&#039;s clarification that the revised policy governed pending appeals and treated the present matter as covered by that administrative threshold. As the Revenue appeal fell outside the monetary limit, the cross objections were also disposed of consequentially, with no separate merits adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1654 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366182</link>
      <description>Government litigation policy limiting Revenue appeals to matters above the enhanced monetary threshold was applied to pending cases as well, so the Tribunal declined to entertain the Revenue appeal where the amount involved was below Rs. 10,00,000 and dismissed it without examining the merits. The Tribunal relied on the Board&#039;s clarification that the revised policy governed pending appeals and treated the present matter as covered by that administrative threshold. As the Revenue appeal fell outside the monetary limit, the cross objections were also disposed of consequentially, with no separate merits adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>