<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1608 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274733</link>
    <description>The appeal before CESTAT Bangalore seeking condonation of a 307-day delay in filing was dismissed due to the applicant&#039;s failure to satisfactorily explain the delay. The delay was attributed to the accountant&#039;s withholding of the order and subsequent rift with management, causing the delay in filing. Despite arguments for a liberal approach, the judicial member declined to condone the delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision was based on the insufficiency of the reasons provided for the lengthy delay. The judgment was pronounced on 09/05/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 06:46:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1608 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274733</link>
      <description>The appeal before CESTAT Bangalore seeking condonation of a 307-day delay in filing was dismissed due to the applicant&#039;s failure to satisfactorily explain the delay. The delay was attributed to the accountant&#039;s withholding of the order and subsequent rift with management, causing the delay in filing. Despite arguments for a liberal approach, the judicial member declined to condone the delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The decision was based on the insufficiency of the reasons provided for the lengthy delay. The judgment was pronounced on 09/05/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>