<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 319 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274724</link>
    <description>Collector v. Bombay Chemicals (Central Excise) records that the SC dismissed the civil appeal; the supplied text contains no substantive legal reasoning or doctrinal analysis. Operative effect: the appellate challenge to the central excise decision was rejected, leaving the lower authority&#039;s decision intact. The entry lists the bench and docket reference but provides no principles, tests, or interpretive guidance that altered or clarified excise law in the available text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 18:50:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 319 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274724</link>
      <description>Collector v. Bombay Chemicals (Central Excise) records that the SC dismissed the civil appeal; the supplied text contains no substantive legal reasoning or doctrinal analysis. Operative effect: the appellate challenge to the central excise decision was rejected, leaving the lower authority&#039;s decision intact. The entry lists the bench and docket reference but provides no principles, tests, or interpretive guidance that altered or clarified excise law in the available text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>