https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274722 Corrupt practice based on alleged collusion between a returned candidate and electoral officers was not proved, because the pleadings and evidence failed to establish the necessary nexus and suspicion could not substitute for proof. The electoral roll could not be amended after 3 p.m. on the last date for nominations: Section 23(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, read with Section 33(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, fixed that point of time as controlling, so names added later were without jurisdiction. Votes cast by such belatedly included electors were required to be excluded after scrutiny of the relevant ballots. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:15:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274722 Corrupt practice based on alleged collusion between a returned candidate and electoral officers was not proved, because the pleadings and evidence failed to establish the necessary nexus and suspicion could not substitute for proof. The electoral roll could not be amended after 3 p.m. on the last date for nominations: Section 23(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, read with Section 33(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, fixed that point of time as controlling, so names added later were without jurisdiction. Votes cast by such belatedly included electors were required to be excluded after scrutiny of the relevant ballots. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274722