<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1646 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366174</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018. The assessee&#039;s quantum appeal was partly allowed, confirming the disallowance of Rs. 84,577 for interest expenses. The penalty appeal of the assessee was allowed, deleting the penalty of Rs. 26,81,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1646 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366174</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018. The assessee&#039;s quantum appeal was partly allowed, confirming the disallowance of Rs. 84,577 for interest expenses. The penalty appeal of the assessee was allowed, deleting the penalty of Rs. 26,81,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>