<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1644 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366172</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that security deposits collected by the club were capital receipts and not taxable income. The court distinguished the deposits as refundable after 25 years, maintaining their character as loans rather than revenue. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to treat the deposits as capital receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:04:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1644 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366172</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that security deposits collected by the club were capital receipts and not taxable income. The court distinguished the deposits as refundable after 25 years, maintaining their character as loans rather than revenue. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to treat the deposits as capital receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>