<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1638 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and directed all issues to be restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the additional evidence to be considered and for the assessee to cooperate with the Revenue in the process. The assessee was instructed to provide all necessary evidence and explanations to support their contentions. The order was pronounced on 24th August 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:59:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1638 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and directed all issues to be restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the additional evidence to be considered and for the assessee to cooperate with the Revenue in the process. The assessee was instructed to provide all necessary evidence and explanations to support their contentions. The order was pronounced on 24th August 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>