<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the rectification application issue back to the Assessing Officer while dismissing grounds related to the addition of notional expenditure under Section 14A. The judgment stressed the need for proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer before using Rule 8D for disallowance computation, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the rectification application issue back to the Assessing Officer while dismissing grounds related to the addition of notional expenditure under Section 14A. The judgment stressed the need for proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer before using Rule 8D for disallowance computation, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>