<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1636 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366164</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to classify the income from the sale of shares as &#039;business income&#039; due to the assessee&#039;s trading intent shown by high frequency and volume of transactions. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under section 14A in accordance with relevant case law. The issue of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature and not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1636 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366164</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to classify the income from the sale of shares as &#039;business income&#039; due to the assessee&#039;s trading intent shown by high frequency and volume of transactions. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the disallowance under section 14A in accordance with relevant case law. The issue of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature and not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>