https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366146 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the Respondent proved the pre-existing dispute on service deficiency before the demand notice issuance under Section 8(1) of the I&B Code. The Appellant's argument that the agreement with another entity didn't apply to the Corporate Debtor was rejected, as transactions were interrelated. The Tribunal held that the conditions for triggering the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process were not met due to the established pre-existing dispute, leading to the dismissal of the petition under Section 9 of the I&B Code. No costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:06:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366146 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the Respondent proved the pre-existing dispute on service deficiency before the demand notice issuance under Section 8(1) of the I&B Code. The Appellant's argument that the agreement with another entity didn't apply to the Corporate Debtor was rejected, as transactions were interrelated. The Tribunal held that the conditions for triggering the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process were not met due to the established pre-existing dispute, leading to the dismissal of the petition under Section 9 of the I&B Code. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366146