<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1616 - INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366144</link>
    <description>An insolvency professional appointed as IRP or RP must act in an individual capacity under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the professional fee and out-of-pocket expenses must be invoiced and received by that professional alone. A separate LLP cannot substitute the professional, cannot enrol as an insolvency professional, and cannot receive fees on the professional&#039;s behalf. The Code prevails over any inconsistent LLP arrangement, and such conduct also breaches the standards of integrity, independence, transparency, and the prohibition on undue influence under the code of conduct. The fee-routing arrangement was therefore held impermissible, and a monetary penalty was imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:06:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1616 - INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366144</link>
      <description>An insolvency professional appointed as IRP or RP must act in an individual capacity under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the professional fee and out-of-pocket expenses must be invoiced and received by that professional alone. A separate LLP cannot substitute the professional, cannot enrol as an insolvency professional, and cannot receive fees on the professional&#039;s behalf. The Code prevails over any inconsistent LLP arrangement, and such conduct also breaches the standards of integrity, independence, transparency, and the prohibition on undue influence under the code of conduct. The fee-routing arrangement was therefore held impermissible, and a monetary penalty was imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>