https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366143 The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company due to non-payment of dues by the petitioner. It found that a substantial dispute existed regarding the claimed debt, indicating the need for resolution in a civil court to determine the petitioner's entitlement. As the respondent raised a genuine dispute, the court concluded that the matter should be addressed through civil remedies rather than winding-up proceedings. en-us Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:06:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366143 The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent company due to non-payment of dues by the petitioner. It found that a substantial dispute existed regarding the claimed debt, indicating the need for resolution in a civil court to determine the petitioner's entitlement. As the respondent raised a genuine dispute, the court concluded that the matter should be addressed through civil remedies rather than winding-up proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366143