<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1601 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366129</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Central Information Commission&#039;s order directing disclosure of Income Tax Returns, emphasizing the need for compliance with procedures under the Right to Information Act. It highlighted that suspicion of underreported income did not warrant disclosure without following prescribed steps, ultimately ruling against the disclosure based on the lack of adherence to statutory procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1601 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366129</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Central Information Commission&#039;s order directing disclosure of Income Tax Returns, emphasizing the need for compliance with procedures under the Right to Information Act. It highlighted that suspicion of underreported income did not warrant disclosure without following prescribed steps, ultimately ruling against the disclosure based on the lack of adherence to statutory procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>