<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1589 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by remanding the matter for reworking the tax liability on reimbursable expenses. The department&#039;s appeal seeking an extension of the limitation period was dismissed. The judgment clarified the classification of services under Cargo Handling Services, applicability of tax liability, and the limitation period for demand based on the nature of services provided at different premises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1589 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by remanding the matter for reworking the tax liability on reimbursable expenses. The department&#039;s appeal seeking an extension of the limitation period was dismissed. The judgment clarified the classification of services under Cargo Handling Services, applicability of tax liability, and the limitation period for demand based on the nature of services provided at different premises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>