<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 63 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14242</link>
    <description>Reassessment may be based on information received after the original assessment order if that later information reveals a defect or error and otherwise qualifies as information for reopening. The later Tribunal order for the earlier assessment year supplied the factual and legal position that prompted the reassessment for the subsequent year. On that basis, the reopening was treated as valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:26:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 63 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14242</link>
      <description>Reassessment may be based on information received after the original assessment order if that later information reveals a defect or error and otherwise qualifies as information for reopening. The later Tribunal order for the earlier assessment year supplied the factual and legal position that prompted the reassessment for the subsequent year. On that basis, the reopening was treated as valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>