<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1574 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366102</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, while confirming the demand of duty and interest for excess clearance of Bitumen. The appellant&#039;s argument of inadvertent excess clearance due to system transition was accepted, with the Tribunal finding no deliberate suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. The appeal was partly allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:17:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1574 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366102</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, while confirming the demand of duty and interest for excess clearance of Bitumen. The appellant&#039;s argument of inadvertent excess clearance due to system transition was accepted, with the Tribunal finding no deliberate suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. The appeal was partly allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>