https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366097 The appellant successfully argued for the eligibility of Cenvat Credit on garden upkeep services, interior decorator services, and renting of immovable property services for branch offices. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified as maintaining green areas was a statutory requirement, interior decorator services had a nexus with manufacturing activities, and renting branch offices was necessary for sales operations. The impugned orders were modified to allow the credit, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs. en-us Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366097 The appellant successfully argued for the eligibility of Cenvat Credit on garden upkeep services, interior decorator services, and renting of immovable property services for branch offices. The denial of credit was deemed unjustified as maintaining green areas was a statutory requirement, interior decorator services had a nexus with manufacturing activities, and renting branch offices was necessary for sales operations. The impugned orders were modified to allow the credit, and the appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366097