<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1566 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the project in question was a standalone project for setting up an independent thermal power plant, not an expansion. The denial of excise duty exemption was deemed unjustified, and the duty demand was found unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs as necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1566 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the project in question was a standalone project for setting up an independent thermal power plant, not an expansion. The denial of excise duty exemption was deemed unjustified, and the duty demand was found unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential reliefs as necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>