<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1565 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demands due to time limitation and inconsistency in the department&#039;s stand. The decision emphasized the correct application of valuation rules under the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, and the impact of previous judgments on determining assessable value for duty calculation. The Tribunal found that the demands were hit by limitation and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, highlighting the importance of following established legal principles in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 06:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1565 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demands due to time limitation and inconsistency in the department&#039;s stand. The decision emphasized the correct application of valuation rules under the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, and the impact of previous judgments on determining assessable value for duty calculation. The Tribunal found that the demands were hit by limitation and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, highlighting the importance of following established legal principles in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>