https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274707 Non-supply and non-consideration of seized documents and seizure details relating to one factual basis for preventive detention were treated as a breach of Article 22(5) because those materials formed part of the basic grounds and were necessary for an effective representation; that separable ground was therefore unsustainable. The detention was nevertheless upheld under Section 5A of the COFEPOSA Act because the challenged material constituted only one independent ground, while the remaining allegations were supported by separate factual foundations and could stand on their own. The severability doctrine thus saved the order, and the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:45:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274707 Non-supply and non-consideration of seized documents and seizure details relating to one factual basis for preventive detention were treated as a breach of Article 22(5) because those materials formed part of the basic grounds and were necessary for an effective representation; that separable ground was therefore unsustainable. The detention was nevertheless upheld under Section 5A of the COFEPOSA Act because the challenged material constituted only one independent ground, while the remaining allegations were supported by separate factual foundations and could stand on their own. The severability doctrine thus saved the order, and the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274707