<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1550 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366078</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2013-2014 to 2015-2016, deleting the levy of late fee under Section 234E. However, for the assessment year 2016-2017, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the late fee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on judicial precedent and the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Act, aligning with the Karnataka High Court&#039;s ruling. The order was pronounced on 27/08/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1550 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366078</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2013-2014 to 2015-2016, deleting the levy of late fee under Section 234E. However, for the assessment year 2016-2017, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the late fee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on judicial precedent and the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Act, aligning with the Karnataka High Court&#039;s ruling. The order was pronounced on 27/08/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>