<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366072</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on intangible assets acquired by the assessee through conversion under section 47(xiv) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The Tribunal held that once assets are part of a block and depreciation is granted, the issue cannot be revisited in subsequent years, citing relevant case law precedents. The Revenue&#039;s argument that the proprietary concern did not possess qualifying intangible assets was not accepted, and the depreciation claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366072</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow depreciation on intangible assets acquired by the assessee through conversion under section 47(xiv) of the Income Tax Act 1961. The Tribunal held that once assets are part of a block and depreciation is granted, the issue cannot be revisited in subsequent years, citing relevant case law precedents. The Revenue&#039;s argument that the proprietary concern did not possess qualifying intangible assets was not accepted, and the depreciation claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>