<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1535 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366063</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over customs valuation rules and related party transactions. The importer and foreign supplier were deemed related, requiring annual declarations of any changes affecting valuation. The Material Supply Agreement&#039;s impact on transaction value was scrutinized, focusing on profit margins. Price comparison between imported goods and assembled products was pivotal, considering assembly processes. The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to remand for reassessment, finding no perversity in the order. The judgment addressed complex issues of customs valuation, related party transactions, contractual agreements, profit margins, and price differentials, providing detailed legal analysis under Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1535 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366063</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over customs valuation rules and related party transactions. The importer and foreign supplier were deemed related, requiring annual declarations of any changes affecting valuation. The Material Supply Agreement&#039;s impact on transaction value was scrutinized, focusing on profit margins. Price comparison between imported goods and assembled products was pivotal, considering assembly processes. The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Authority&#039;s decision to remand for reassessment, finding no perversity in the order. The judgment addressed complex issues of customs valuation, related party transactions, contractual agreements, profit margins, and price differentials, providing detailed legal analysis under Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>