<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1533 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366061</link>
    <description>A bona fide purchaser of a DEPB licence from the open market was held not liable to duty demand or penalty for imports made under that licence. The appellate finding was supported by existing precedent, and the legal position was treated as settled, leaving no infirmity in the relief granted to the respondent. On that basis, the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1533 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366061</link>
      <description>A bona fide purchaser of a DEPB licence from the open market was held not liable to duty demand or penalty for imports made under that licence. The appellate finding was supported by existing precedent, and the legal position was treated as settled, leaving no infirmity in the relief granted to the respondent. On that basis, the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>